Legal Opinion

Holt v. Tullett

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 19, 1906PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal prom District Magistrate, Honolulu.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

WILDER, J. (Prear, C.J., dissenting.)

Plaintiff secured judgment against defendant in the district court of Honolulu for the sum of $120.38. Execution on this judgment was returned wholly unsatisfied. Then under Section 2118 of the Revised Laws the garnishee was cited in and ordered to pay plaintiff the sum of $65 found to be due defendant as wages from the garnishee. From this decision of the district court the garnishee appealed to this court on the point oi law that it was and is void because defendant was a seaman within the meaning of Section 4536 of the H. S.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ross v. BourneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1883
  2. The George W. WellsDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1902
  3. McCarty v. Steam-Propeller City of New BedfordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1880
  4. The QueenDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1899
  5. Telles v. LyndeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schnack v. ClarkHawaii Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API