Legal Opinion

Schnack v. Clark

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal prom District Magistrate op Honolulu.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

ROBERTSON, C.J.

This is an appeal upon a point of law from a decision and order of the district court of Honolulu whereby the garnishee in the case was discharged. The action was assumpsit and the court gave judgment for the plaintiff against the defendant for the sum of $40.10 but declined to hold the money due the defendant from the garnishee on the ground that the defendant was a seaman within the meaning of section 4536 of the Revised Statutes of the Hnited States and that his wages are therefore not subject to garnishment. It was admitted that the defendant was a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilder v. Inter-Island Steam Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Eddy v. O'HaraMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  3. United States v. THE" GRACE LOTHROP"Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Ross v. BourneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1883
  5. The AmeliaDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Byrne v. KaleikiHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Correa v. Waiakea Mill Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Powell v. Global Marine, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API