Legal Opinion
The Queen
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 15, 1899No. 11,802PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DE HAVEN, District Judge.
This is a libel in rem to recover wages earned by the lihelant as a seaman, and a further sum for meals provided by himself during his service as such. The case has been submitted to the court 'for decision upon an agreed statement of facts, from which it appears that on February 2, 1899, the sum of $25 was due to the libelant for services rendered by him as a seaman on the steamship Queen, and the further sum of $1.68 on account of meals paid for by himself during the time of such service; and on that day the money so due him was levied upon, in the hands of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Edwards v. KearzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Seibert v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Ross v. BourneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1883
- McCarty v. Steam-Propeller City of New BedfordDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Rauer's Collection Co. v. HigginsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Medical Finance Assn. v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- In Re FoxDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1936
- Smith v. HumeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- In Re RichardsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.