Legal Opinion
Florence Tanners, Inc. v. Vidosh (In Re Florence Tanners, Inc.)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided July 28, 1995No. 19-43014PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION GRANTING DEBTOR’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
STEVEN W. RHODES, Chief Judge.
The. debtor brought this preference action pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 547(b). 1 This matter is now before the Court on a motion for summary judgment filed by the debtor. Following review of the briefs, the Court holds that the debtor is entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law.
I
The parties entered into a settlement agreement approximately one year prior to the filing of the bankruptcy petition. The settlement related to a suit brought by Helen Vidosh, a former employee of the debtor, alleging sex…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barnhill v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re Fred Hawes Organization, Inc., Debtor. William B. Logan, Trustee v. Basic Distribution CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- James A. Lewis, Esquire, Trustee for Joseph M. Eaton Builders, Inc. v. Thomas J. And Linda M. DiethornCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- In re CoppieCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Richardson v. Philadelphia Housing Authority (In Re Richardson)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Southmark Corp. v. Schulte, Roth & Zabel (In Re Southmark Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1997
- Wachovia Bank, N.A. v. Commonwealth Sprinkler Co. (In Re Commonwealth Sprinkler Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 2001
- Southmark Corp. v. Schulte, Roth & Zabel (In re Southmark Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1997