Legal Opinion

Southmark Corp. v. Schulte, Roth & Zabel (In re Southmark Corp.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas

Decided March 24, 1997No. Bankruptcy No. 389-36324-SAF-11; Adversary No. 391-3364Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

STEVEN A. FELSENTHAL, Bankruptcy Judge.

Southmark Corporation moves the court for a summary judgment under 11 U.S.C. §§ 547 and 550 against Schulte, Roth & Zabel for $1,000,000 plus interest. Schulte, Roth cross-moves for partial summary judgment. The court conducted a hearing on the motions on December 17,1996.

Summary judgment is proper if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, and other matters presented to the court show that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Butner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API