Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Kemna

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 5, 2010No. 09-2495PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RILEY, Circuit Judge.

This case is before us for the third time. After William A. Armstrong (Armstrong) was convicted in Missouri state court of first-degree murder and various other charges, Armstrong filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court denied Armstrong’s application, and this court remanded for the district court to consider Armstrong’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See Armstrong v. Kemna, 365 F.3d 622, 630 (8th Cir.2004) (Armstrong I). The district court found Armstrong’s counsel acted reasonably and again denied…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Leonard Marvin Laws v. Bill ArmontroutCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  5. Terrick Alfred Williams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Rippo v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Rahsaan Taylor v. Wendy KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  3. Dimetrious Woods v. Jeff NormanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  4. McLaughlin v. SteeleDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2016
  5. Armstrong v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API