Legal Opinion

United States v. Hinckley

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 16, 2009No. Criminal 81-0306 (PLF)PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the proposal of St. Elizabeths Hospital for the conditional release of John W. Hinckley, Jr. pursuant to 24 D.C.Code § 501(e) — a so-called “(e) proposal” or “(e) letter.” 1 This is the latest in a series of proposals submitted by the Hospital to this Court over the years. On each occasion, the Hospital has sought to enlarge the scope and/or the duration of Mr. Hinckley’s activities beyond the grounds of the Hospital, and the government has opposed the Hospital’s proposals in whole or in part.

The Court has…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. HinckleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
  2. United States v. HinckleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  3. United States v. HinckleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  4. United States v. HinckleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  5. United States v. HinckleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. HinckleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
  2. United States v. WalkerDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2011
  3. United States v. HinckleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  4. Daniel Demissie v. Aaron D. Ford, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2026
  5. Sanchez v. Renown South Meadows Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API