United States v. Walker
District Court, W.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBERT HOLMES BELL, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s objections, (Dkt. No. 26), to Magistrate Judge Greeley’s January 7, 2011, Report and Recommendation (“R & R”). (Dkt. No. 25.) In the R & R, the Magistrate Judge recommends that Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence, (Dkt. No. 13), be denied. The Court is required to review de novo those portions of the R & R to which specific objections are made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The Court may accept, reject, or modify any or all of the Magistrate Judge’s findings or recommendations. Id. For the reasons which…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the United States for an Order Authorizing Disclosure of Location Information of a Specified Wireless TelephoneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- United States v. RoseDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2012
- United States v. RobinsonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2012
- United States v. NarrlDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2011
- State v. CousinoOhio Court of Appeals · 2016