Garrett v. Goodwin
District Court, E.D. Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
CONSENT DECREE AND JUDGMENT
Based on the Joint Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law entered in this case, the parties enter into the following consent decree for injunctive relief:
1. The Court adopts the Joint Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law as the findings of the court in this case under F.R.C.P. 52(a).
2. The Court further finds that the conduct of this roadblock, as it affected the plaintiffs herein, constituted a seizure under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
3. The defendants, State Police employees, are permanently enjoined to promulgate…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Get Away Club, Inc. v. Vic Coleman, Jim SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Mings v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Commonwealth v. LeninskySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Hagood v. Town of Town CreekCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1993
- Stark v. PerpichDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.