Legal Opinion

Stark v. Perpich

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided August 2, 1984No. CIVIL 4-84-656PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER INCORPORATING FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction. The plaintiff seeks to have the defendants enjoined from conducting a roadside drunk driving survey of motorists that would involve stopping automobiles on public roads and administering blood alcohol content breath tests to consenting drivers.

FACTS

The proposed survey, to be conducted by private researchers hired by the state and assisted by the State Highway Patrol, is designed to gather current data…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. Brignoni-PonceSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. Martinez-FuerteSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. State v. OlgaardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TrumbleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  2. State v. HendersonIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  3. People v. BanksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. State v. GarciaIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API