Legal Opinion
United States v. Bay Area Battery
District Court, N.D. Florida
Decided August 18, 1995No. Civ. A. 94-50390-LACPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING ENTRY OF CONSENT DECREE
COLLIER, District Judge.
Pending is the Government’s motion for entry of a consent decree in this action brought under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA). The Government negotiated the decree with 11 companies and individuals identified as potentially responsible parties (PRP’s) under CERCLA for the contamination at the Sapp Battery Superfund Site (the Site). Intervenor Jackson Iron & Metal Co. opposes the decree. After reviewing the briefs and evidence, the Court grants the Government’s motion.
I
Factual…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Dedham Water Company v. Cumberland Farms Dairy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Amcast Industrial Corporation and Elkhart Products Corporation v. Detrex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pinal Creek Group v. Newmont Mining Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Pinal Creek Group v. Newmont Mining CorpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Akzo Coatings, Inc. v. Ainger Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1995
- United States v. Federal Resources Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Stearns & Foster Bedding Co. v. Franklin Holding Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.