Legal Opinion

State v. Tillitt

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 2018No. WD 80260PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Admission of the Written Statement

As to her written statement, Ms. Tillitt renewed her motion to suppress during trial and specifically objected to its admission as a Fifth Amendment self-incrimination violation, but did not argue the other, more specific grounds set forth in the motion, such as that the "interrogation" was "inherently coercive" or a due-process violation. The trial court asked counsel if this was "the extent of your record? Is that all your record?" Counsel responded, "Yes." Ms. Tillitt raised an involuntariness challenge indirectly by reference to her motion to suppress…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. ChurchillSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
  2. State v. JohnsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  4. State v. CollinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. State v. BenedictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. WrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. State v. TateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. In the Matter of the Care and Treatment of: A.K., a/k/a A.D.K.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2023
  4. Melinda Tillitt v. State of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2025
  5. State of Missouri v. Brandon TateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API