Legal Opinion

State v. Wright

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 21, 2018No. ED 106935PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert G. Dowd, Jr., Presiding Judge

Kimberly Gardner seeks, on behalf of the State, a writ of prohibition against the Honorable Clinton R. Wright to prevent him from enforcing his order excluding certain expert testimony in a child sex case. We entered a preliminary order of prohibition, and a timely answer and suggestions in opposition were filed. We dispense with further briefing as permitted by Rule 84.24(j). We now make that preliminary order permanent.

Introduction

This case involves the application of recently-enacted new standards for the admissibility of expert testimony in a criminal…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  4. Scott Johnson v. Mead Johnson & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2014
  5. State Board of Registration for the Healing Arts v. McDonaghSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Tarshish Jones v. City of Kansas City, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State of Missouri v. Jafari R. BossMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Amy Revis v. Donald Bassman, M.D.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Amy Revis v. Donald Bassman, M.D.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Christopher Gebhardt v. American Honda Motor Co., IncMissouri Court of Appeals · 2021

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API