Legal Opinion

Wetzler v. Patterson

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 9, 1925No. Docket No. 4003PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinlatson, P. J.

Plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, brought two actions in the court below. In the one first commenced they sued for the recovery of three months’ rent, due, respectively, on the 15th of November, 1920, and the fifteenth days of February and March, 1921, and also for a sum alleged to be due for water used by defendant as the lessee and which the latter, under the terms of his lease, had undertaken to pay. Later plaintiffs brought the other action, one for unlawful detainer, commenced after due service of the statutory notice to pay the overdue rent which had accrued since the first action…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Galbraith v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Green v. FrahmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Oakes v. . DelanceyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Rockwell v. Eiler's Music HouseWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Dutton v. ChristieWashington Supreme Court · 1911

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Servais v. KleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  2. Schoen v. New Britain Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  3. A-1 Garage v. Lange Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. Redmon v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Grand Central Public Market Inc. v. KojimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API