Legal Opinion
Walker v. Zuehlke
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 2, 2002No. C9-00-1863PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANCASTER, Justice.
The issue before us is whether Minn. Stat. ch. 276A (1998), commonly referred to as the Range Fiscal Disparities Act (RFDA), violates the Uniformity Clause of the Minnesota Constitution, Minn. Const, art. X, § 1. The district court held the RFDA violates the Uniformity Clause, finding no reasonable relationship between the benefits and burdens of the RFDA. The court of appeals reversed. Walker v. Itasca County Auditor, 624 N.W.2d 599, 603 (Minn.App.2001). We affirm.
Appellant Jeffrey Walker resides in and is the mayor of Cohasset, Minnesota. He is also a general…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Madden v. Kentucky Ex Rel. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Reed v. BjornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- Visina v. FreemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Council of Independent Tobacco Manufacturers of America v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- In Re Eveleth Mines, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2004
- Haugen v. Superior Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- Singer v. CommissionerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Minnesota Automatic Merchandising Council v. SalomoneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.