Caviness v. Rushton
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Hendricks Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
The appellant in the first paragraph of her complaint set forth the following instrument:
“ October 13, 1882.
“ I promise Emily Caviness to give her two thousand dollars at my death to take care of her children with, which she claims of my estate. She has been in my family nineteen years and a faithful servant, and it is my will to her.”
And alleged that it was executed by "William R. Rushton in "his lifetime, and that Rushton died some time after the execution of the instrument, and that the appellee is the administrator of his estate.
We do not think the instrument declared on can be re*501garded…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Johnston v. GriestIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Bell v. Hewitt's ExecutorsIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Stearns v. DuboisIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Snyder v. SnyderIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Moore v. StephensIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wallace v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Manning v. PippenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Long v. StrausIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Wellington v. ApthorpMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
- Roehl v. HaumesserIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.