Legal Opinion

Vreeland v. Zupan

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 9, 2018No. 16-1503PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORITZ, Circuit Judge.

Delmart Vreeland II sought relief in federal district court under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 , alleging in relevant part that the state trial court violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel and his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process. The district court rejected both claims and declined to issue a certificate of appealability (COA).

Vreeland later obtained a COA from this court to appeal the district court's resolution of his Sixth Amendment claim. Pursuant to that COA, he now argues on appeal that the district court erred in denying him relief on that claim. He also asks…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. In re: Syngenta AG MIR162Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2023
  2. Farrar v. RaemischCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. Johnson v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
  4. Martinez v. QuickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2025
  5. State v. TrassSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API