Legal Opinion

Farrar v. Raemisch

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided May 21, 2019No. 18-1005PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge.

*1129 Mr. Charles Farrar, a Colorado state prisoner, appeals the district court's denial of his petition for habeas relief. In district court, Mr. Farrar claimed

• actual innocence,

• deprivation of due process based on the recantation of a key prosecution witness, and

• deprivation of due process based on a state appellate decision establishing an overly restrictive standard for a new trial.

The district court denied relief, and we affirm based on three conclusions:

1. Actual innocence does not supply a freestanding basis for habeas relief.

2. A private citizen's false…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Schlup v. DeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Childers v. CrowCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
  2. Cedric Cal v. Jason GarnettCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2021
  3. In re: Weldon Stewart, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2023
  4. Alexander v. LNUDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025
  5. Bayha (ID 114199) v. MeyerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API