State v. Barnard
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.
[¶ 1] Pursuant to 15 M.R.S.A. § 2115-A(2) (1980 & Supp.2000), the State appeals from a judgment of acquittal entered in the Superior Court (Washington County, Studstrup, J.) in favor of the defendant, Gary Barnard, following a trial at which a jury found Barnard guilty of drug trafficking (Class B). 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1103 (Supp.2000). 1 The State contends that there was ample evidence on which the jury could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that Barnard was in illegal possession of a scheduled drug, and, accordingly, that the court erred in entering the judgment of acquittal. We agree and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. Wilson Tony Harrell, James Hawkins, Anthony Scire, Karl Heinz HarigCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- State v. MardenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- State v. HowesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
- United States v. Miguel Dimarzo, A/K/A Michael Dimarzo, United States of America v. Mario J. Alzate-YepezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Copeland v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. AllenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
- State v. BasuSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
- State v. RollinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
- State v. MooresSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- State v. WooSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.