Legal Opinion

State v. Barnard

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 11, 2001PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClifford, J.

[¶ 1] Pursuant to 15 M.R.S.A. § 2115-A(2) (1980 & Supp.2000), the State appeals from a judgment of acquittal entered in the Superior Court (Washington County, Studstrup, J.) in favor of the defendant, Gary Barnard, following a trial at which a jury found Barnard guilty of drug trafficking (Class B). 17-A M.R.S.A. § 1103 (Supp.2000). 1 The State contends that there was ample evidence on which the jury could conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that Barnard was in illegal possession of a scheduled drug, and, accordingly, that the court erred in entering the judgment of acquittal. We agree and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. Wilson Tony Harrell, James Hawkins, Anthony Scire, Karl Heinz HarigCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. State v. MardenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  3. State v. HowesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  4. United States v. Miguel Dimarzo, A/K/A Michael Dimarzo, United States of America v. Mario J. Alzate-YepezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  5. Copeland v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. AllenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  2. State v. BasuSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2005
  3. State v. RollinsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  4. State v. MooresSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  5. State v. WooSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2007

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API