Legal Opinion
United States v. Miguel Dimarzo, A/K/A Michael Dimarzo, United States of America v. Mario J. Alzate-Yepez
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 13, 1996No. 95-1441, 95-1442PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYR, Circuit Judge.
Appellants' Mario Alzate-Yepez (“Mario” or “Alzate”) and Miguel DiMarzo were jointly tried and convicted of possessing cocaine, with intent to distribute, see -21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) (1994), and conspiracy, see id. § 846. Appellants assign error by the district court in allowing certain trial testimony and denying their respective motions for judgments of acquittal. Appellant Alzate additionally claims that the district court erred in denying his pretrial motion for severance and imposed too harsh'a- sentence. Finding no error, we affirm.
I
BACKGROUND
In April 1994, the Western…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Shannon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Johnny Rafael Batista-PolancoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- United States v. MorilloCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. FulmerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1997
- United States v. JosleynCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Ortiz-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- United States v. KayneCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- United States v. AzubikeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.