Legal Opinion

Thornley Land & Livestock Co. v. Morgan Bros. Land & Livestock Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1932No. 4891PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCherry, C. J.

In this action the plaintiff alleged its individual ownership of a right of way, acquired by prescriptive use, over certain lands of defendant, and prayed for a decree judicially establishing its right and restraining defendant from interfering with the plaintiff’s use thereof. After a trial, the plaintiff had a decree as prayed for, from which the defendant has appealed. Insufficiency of the evidence to justify or support the finding by the court of a prescriptive right of way in favor of the plaintiff is the principal ground upon which the decree is assailed.

In several particulars, it is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lindsay Land & Live Stock Co. v. ChurnosUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Libertini v. SchroederCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  3. Providence, Fall River & Newport Steamboat Co. v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  4. Tress v. PivorottoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Simmons v. PerkinsIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  2. J. F. Gioia, Inc. v. Cardinal American Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Thurman v. ByramUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Bertolina v. FratesUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Kohler v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API