Legal Opinion

Bertolina v. Frates

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1936No. 5562PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATES, District Judge.

This action was brought by plaintiffs to quiet title to a tract of ground owned by them in Salt Lake county, Utah. For the purpose of illustrating the comments made in this opinion, a plat of the area immediately surrounding plaintiffs’ land follows:

To plaintiffs’ complaint the defendants, Albert Frates, Lyman-Callister Company, Walker Bros., Bankers, and Lester F. North have answered. Melinda H. Butterworth, Henry R. Williams, and Mercy Williams, his wife, and Phe-noy Charles Donelson, and Frank Frates were named as defendants. It will be observed by an examination of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lindsay Land & Live Stock Co. v. ChurnosUtah Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Schulenbarger v. JohnstoneWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Funk v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Farr v. Wheelwright Construction Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Thornley Land & Livestock Co. v. Morgan Bros. Land & Livestock Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Savage v. NielsenUtah Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Thurman v. ByramUtah Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Chournos v. AlkemaUtah Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Clyde Bingham v. James KnippCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API