Legal Opinion

Kohler v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided May 2, 1996No. 950345-CAPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAVIS, Associate Presiding Judge:

Stephen C. Martin appeals the trial court’s rulings regarding access rights to a ten-foot-wide driveway occupying a portion of his property. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand in part.

FACTS

The property in question is a narrow strip of land approximately 56 feet wide and 277 feet long. A driveway approximately ten feet wide runs through the property and provides access to both the Martin and the Kohler residences. The testimony at trial was that historically this entire strip of land was regarded and treated as a public roadway (roadway). The…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. AllenUtah Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Draper City v. Estate of BernardoUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Bonner v. SudburyUtah Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Memmott v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1982

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Butler, Crockett & Walsh Development Corp. v. Pinecrest Pipeline Operating Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Wasatch County v. OkelberryCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2006
  3. Van Denburgh v. Sweeney Land Co.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  4. In Re Gen. Determination of Rights of WaterUtah Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API