Legal Opinion

Pue v. County of Lewis and Clark

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 22, 1926No. 5,829PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE' STARK

delivered the opinion of the court.

The complaint in this action alleges that defendant, “through its board of health and one [Dr.] Arthur Jordan, its county health officer, employed plaintiff to perform certain labor and services in sanitary and excavating operations in and about the town of East Helena,” and promised to pay him the reasonable value thereof; that the plaintiff duly performed the same, and that the reasonable value thereof was $523.25; that he duly presented his claim for this amount to defendant and demanded payment thereof, which was refused, and prays…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reams v. CooleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Capital Lumber Co. v. BarthMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. State ex rel. Coad v. Judge of the Ninth Judicial District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Colwell v. Grandin Investment Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Keeler Bros. v. School District No. 3Montana Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Williard v. CampbellMontana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Hicks v. Stillwater CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  3. In Re Anderson's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Pue v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State v. BourdeauMontana Supreme Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API