Legal Opinion
Howe v. Neal
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 25, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The defendants James F. Neal, Jr., and Marjorie Neal have appealed from a judgment entered upon a verdict against them and two other defendants. They assign error in the denial of their motions to set aside the verdict and for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, in the court’s charge, and in the finding.
We shall consider first the court’s ruling on the motions. The jury could have found the following facts from the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Pierce v. Albanese, 144 Conn. 241, 257, 129 A.2d 606. On March 1, 1955, shortly before 4 o’clock in the afternoon,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pierce v. AlbaneseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- Floyd v. Fruit Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
- State v. PambianchiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Giambartolomei v. Rocky DeCarlo & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Henry v. BaconSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ebersole v. LowengrubSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
- Haislet v. CrowleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Cottiero v. IfkovicConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Myers v. NicholsonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1963