Legal Opinion

Accetola v. Hood

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1967No. Docket 1,394PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLesinski, C. J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment entered on a directed verdict pursuant to defendants’ motion therefor at the close of plaintiff’s proofs.

The cause arose from an unfortunate fall which the plaintiff experienced on May 15, 1962. On that date, plaintiff was endeavoring to undertake repairs on the exterior of his house and was using a ladder which belonged to the defendants Hood and was allegedly manufactured by the corporate defendant, Michigan Ladder Company. Plaintiff’s fall from said ladder resulted in personal injuries and he brought the instant action alleging in essence two legal theories for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Piercefield v. Remington Arms Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  2. People v. HawthorneMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Lipsitz v. SchechterMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. EavesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1966
  5. Standard Drug Store v. A. E. Wood & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Charles Reinhart Co. v. WiniemkoMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Farr v. Wheeler Manufacturing Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  3. Groth v. DeGrandchampMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Selmo v. BaratonoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  5. People v. Charles WilsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API