Ragsdale v. Tom-Boy, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOERNER, Commissioner.
This is an action begun in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, in which plaintiff sought the recovery of $30,273.13 upon an alleged contract of employment. Judgment below was for plaintiff in the sum of $5,321.00, from which, after the overruling of its timely motions, defendant has duly prosecuted its appeal to this court.
Defendant, Tom Boy, Inc., is a wholesale food company, owned in part by grocers, butchers, and other retailers of food. Its primary purpose is to act as a buying organization for its members, to whom it sells at a very small mark-up, so that…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mathews v. Modern Woodmen of AmericaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
- Layton v. PalmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Mickelberry's Food Products Co. v. HaeussermannSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- State Mut. Life Assur. Co. of Worchester v. DischingerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
- Browder v. MillaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1956
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Boehm Ex Rel. v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Wren v. St. Louis Public Service CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
- Keith v. TuckerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1972
- O'Brien v. Missouri Cities Water Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Celatron, Inc. ex rel. Andrews v. Cavic Engineering Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.