Spiegelman v. Union Railway Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendant, Samuel Spiegelman, from an order of the Municipal Court of the city of New York, borough of the Bronx, entered in the office of the clerk of- said court on the 11th day of August, 1903, denying the defendant’s motion for a review of the taxation of costs under an order of' this court affirming the judgment herein.
1Per curiam
Upon an appeal herein by the defendant the judgment in favor of the plaintiff was affirmed, with costs. (Speigelman v. Union Railway Co., 86 App. Div. 632.) Upon the taxation of costs in the Municipal Court under our order of affirmance, the clerk allowed the respondent an item of fifteen dollars “ incurred for copying the stenographer’s minutes ” as a necessary disbursement upon the appeal. The defendant subsequently moved in the Municipal Court for a review of the taxation and a disallowance of this item. The motion was denied, and from the order denying the application the present appeal…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Cohen v. Ridgewood Shirt Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lyons v. MulvihillAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
- B. P. Ducas Co. v. Continental Finishing Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
- Lassen v. Anthony Stumpf Publishing Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1911
- Mishkind-Feinberg Realty Co. v. RosenhaftAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909
- People v. McDermott Dairy Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.