People v. Hendricks
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. During the People’s direct case, the prosecutor elicited police testimony that defendant was given his Miranda warnings, acknowledged receipt of the warnings and agreed in writing to waive his rights. The officer further testified that, after obtaining the waiver, he informed defendant that he would like to obtain a written statement whereupon defendant responded, "I’ll talk to you but I am not signing anything else.” Defendant then gave an oral statement.
In these circumstances, the officer’s testimony did…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Connecticut v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Crosby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
- People v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.