Legal Opinion

People v. Hendricks

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 16, 1997PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. During the People’s direct case, the prosecutor elicited police testimony that defendant was given his Miranda warnings, acknowledged receipt of the warnings and agreed in writing to waive his rights. The officer further testified that, after obtaining the waiver, he informed defendant that he would like to obtain a written statement whereupon defendant responded, "I’ll talk to you but I am not signing anything else.” Defendant then gave an oral statement.

In these circumstances, the officer’s testimony did…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Connecticut v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. RogersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Crosby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2012
  5. People v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API