United States v. Linda K. Frykholm, Intervening Third-Party Claimant: Cotswold Trading Company, Ltd.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge.
Linda Frykholm must have the tongue of an angel, though she has the morals of a fiend. She persuaded people to invest $15 million in a get-rich-quick scheme, even though the promises she made were transparently too good to be true (100% return in a month) and she had no means to back her promises. Her only relevant credential was a 1994 conviction for theft and forgery, which she did not tout; her “business address” was a mail drop; routine inquiry would have disclosed that the corporations through which she purported to do business did not exist and that Illinois…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- United States v. Lawrence W. Lavin Wmot Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Beverly J. Ramsey, Michael J. Marshall, Stuart A. McCreary and James Joseph O'DOnnellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Linda FrykholmCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Barbara Pacheco, United States of America v. John Serendensky, A/K/A John Vitolano, Joseph Foti & Guy FotiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- B.E.L.T., Inc. v. Wachovia CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Huntington National BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Jennings v. Bodrick (In re Bodrick)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- United States v. O'ConnorDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.