Legal Opinion

Paul E. Repass v. Albert L. Vreeland and Leonard G. Brown, Individuals, and Vreeland & Brown, Anew Jersey Partnership in the Practice of Law

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 31, 1968No. 16632_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Before HASTIE, FREEDMAN and VAN DUSEN, Circuit Judges.

HASTIE, Chief Judge.

This is a diversity action by a Missouri physician against his former New Jersey attorneys for damages allegedly caused by their negligent failure to file an action for him until after the statute of limitations had run. Damages are sought for the loss of the value of the plaintiffs claim and for expenses incurred in attempting to recover on it.

Upon the basis of the pleadings and depositions, the district court granted partial summary judgment for the defendants upon the demand for the loss of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Repass v. Keleket X-Ray Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richard H. Underwood v. Hammond C. Woods, Robert I. Adelman, Chester B. Kaplan and G. M. OsgoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
  2. Paul E. Repass v. Albert L. Vreeland and Leonard G. Brown, Individuals, and Vreeland & Brown, Anew Jersey Partnership in the Practice of LawCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API