Legal Opinion

City of Tacoma v. Bonnell

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 2, 1910No. 8633PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Easterday, J., entered October 21,, 1909, upon the verdict of a jury assessing damages in a proceeding to condemn land for public improvements.

1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.

This is an appeal from an award of damages under the statute authorizing cities of the first class to condemn property for public improvements. The jury rendered a verdict in form as follows:

“We, the jury in the above entitled cause, duly empaneled and sworn to try the issues herein between the petitioner and the several defendants do find and adjudge that the following sums be allowed to the several defendants for the value of lands taken, for damages to remaining lands not taken, *595for damages by reason of proposed street grade, and for cost of removing buildings.
“14th. To the defendants…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Petition for Regrade of Jackson StreetWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Standard Furniture Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Beecher v. GilliamWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  2. City of Seattle v. AtwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API