Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion
Texas Attorney General Reports
1Opinion of the Court
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN / Honorable R. A. Barton, Page 2 our lnveetigation of authorities ..- disolosed - that fn a large number of states snob a Jornaer or separare owners 01 separate and distinct parcels of land, in a sing&a cond~emnation prooeeding, is provided for br statute. Sea hailroad V. Christy, 92 Ill. 339; Barton v. Eleotrlo Railway, 220 Ill. 99; Taooma v. Bonell, 58 lash. 595, 109 P. 60; Friedenwald v. Mayor of Baltimore, 94 lid. 116. Other states, like Texas,.do not by statute speoltlaallyprwfde tar the joinder of separate owner8 ei separate tract8 oi lend…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Haverbekken v. Hale, County JudgeTexas Supreme Court · 1918
- Hughes v. City of CairoIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
- City of Tacoma v. BonnellWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Jones v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929