Legal Opinion

Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion

Texas Attorney General Reports

Decided July 2, 1939No. O-221Published

1Opinion of the Court

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN / Honorable R. A. Barton, Page 2 our lnveetigation of authorities ..- disolosed - that fn a large number of states snob a Jornaer or separare owners 01 separate and distinct parcels of land, in a sing&a cond~emnation prooeeding, is provided for br statute. Sea hailroad V. Christy, 92 Ill. 339; Barton v. Eleotrlo Railway, 220 Ill. 99; Taooma v. Bonell, 58 lash. 595, 109 P. 60; Friedenwald v. Mayor of Baltimore, 94 lid. 116. Other states, like Texas,.do not by statute speoltlaallyprwfde tar the joinder of separate owner8 ei separate tract8 oi lend…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Haverbekken v. Hale, County JudgeTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Hughes v. City of CairoIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  3. City of Tacoma v. BonnellWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Jones v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API