Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Schmitz v. Knight

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 24, 2007No. 58250-0-IPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*293¶1 — When an adjudication may result in incarceration, the accused has the right to counsel under the state and federal constitutions.1 This right applies equally in contempt proceedings. The right to counsel can be waived or forfeited, but absent express warnings on the record about the consequences of proceeding pro se, the right is forfeited only by extremely dilatory conduct. Failure to apply for a public defender despite warnings from the State that it would seek jail time and repeated instructions from the court to do so is certainly dilatory, but it does not rise to the level of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Tetro v. TetroWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. City of Tacoma v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  4. Ramsey v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
  5. In re the Welfare of G.E.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Parental Rights to M. I-S.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API