City of Tacoma v. Bishop
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtHoughton, J.
Joseph R. Bishop appeals his conviction for two counts of indecent liberties on grounds that the trial court violated his constitutional right to counsel by requiring him to proceed to trial without counsel and without a valid waiver of that right. Finding that Bishop neither waived nor forfeited his right to counsel by his dil atory conduct, and that the municipal court erred in requiring him to represent himself at trial without a waiver or proper warnings, we reverse and remand.
FACTS
Bishop was charged with two counts of indecent liberties against C.P., the 10-year-old daughter of his…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. GentryWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. Ronald J. GoldbergCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- City of Bellevue v. AcreyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. DeWeeseWashington Supreme Court · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State v. CarruthersTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. ModicaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- State v. ModicaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Ramsey v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- City of Seattle v. KleinWashington Supreme Court · 2007
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.