Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Rinder v. Goff

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1906PublishedCited by 31 opinions

Mandamus to the County Clerk of Dane County. At the opening of court bn the 9th day of October, 1906, application was made to the court by the attorney general, on the sworn complaint or relation of Christian F. Binder, for leave to commence an action in equity in this court to enjoin the defendant, as county clerk of Dane county, from printing the name of one W. S. Packard as Republican candidate for county treasurer of said county upon the official ballot for the general…

Read the full summary

Mandamus to the County Clerk of Dane County. At the opening of court bn the 9th day of October, 1906, application was made to the court by the attorney general, on the sworn complaint or relation of Christian F. Binder, for leave to commence an action in equity in this court to enjoin the defendant, as county clerk of Dane county, from printing the name of one W. S. Packard as Republican candidate for county treasurer of said county upon the official ballot for the general election in November following, and to command him to.print the name of the relator as such candidate upon such ballot.…

1Opinion of the Court

*674On October 18th judgment was rendered quashing the return and adjudging that the peremptory writ of mandamus issue. The following opinion was filed November 7, 1906:

WiNsnow, T.

The importance of this case,' as being the first case involving the construction of the new primary election law (ch. 4-51, Laws of 1903), was fully appreciated by this court from its inception. It was manifest at once that, if any remedy were to be given, it must be given quickly if it were to be effective. At the same time it was realized that the importance of the questions involved imperatively demanded deliberate…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Attorney General v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  3. State ex rel. Fourth National Bank of Philadelphia v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  4. State ex rel. Cook v. HouserWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State ex rel. Wood v. BakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Love v. WilcoxTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. State ex rel. Bolens v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Sterling v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1932
  5. State ex rel. McGrael v. PhelpsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API