Legal Opinion
Mead v. City First Bank of DC, N.A.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided March 5, 2009No. Civil Action No. 08-1597 (RWR)PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
In his original complaint, plaintiff David Mead brought claims against defendant City First Bank of DC alleging fraud and uncon-scionability regarding loan arrangements between the parties. Mead has filed a motion for leave to amend the complaint to add additional claims and defendants. Among other pending motions are the defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment, the defendant’s motion for an entry of default, the plaintiffs motion for an extension of time to file an answer to the defendant’s counterclaim, and the plaintiffs motion for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Richard Atchinson v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
3Cited by11 opinions
- Brown v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Dave v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Kurtz v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Gross v. WrightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Brown v. Federal Bureau of InvestigationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.