Legal Opinion
Kurtz v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 26, 2011No. Civil Action 10-1270 (RWR)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff James D. Lammers Kurtz has named the United States as a defendant in a complaint concerning property located in Wisconsin and harms occurring in Wisconsin. The complaint alleges misconduct by four federal judges, and that the United States unlawfully holds property belonging to the plaintiff. The United States has moved to dismiss, and the plaintiff has moved for leave to amend his complaint. Because the United States has not waived its sovereign immunity with respect to the plaintiffs claims that are based upon his…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Clayton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Rodriguez v. ShulmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
- McAlister v. PotterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Khan v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Cohan v. United States Trustee ProgramDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.