Legal Opinion
Dave v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 12, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2008-0856PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting the Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Leave to File an Amended Complaint
RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter comes before the court on the plaintiffs renewed motion for leave to file an amended complaint. The plaintiff, a former cadet at the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department Institute of Police Science (“IPS”), alleges that the District of Columbia discriminated and retaliated against him in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-3(a) et seq. The plaintiff now seeks to amend his…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Golden v. Mgmt. & Training Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Howell v. GrayDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Hajjar-Nejad v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Golden v. Management & Training CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Gatling v. Jubilee Housing, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.