Legal Opinion

Ceta Workers' Action Committee v. City of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 27, 1981No. 76 Civ. 4934-CSHPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HAIGHT, District Judge:

Individual plaintiffs Carter, Killings and Kearer were employed by the City of New York under Title II of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. (“CETA” or “the Act”). They were discharged under circumstances which plaintiffs allege violated constitutionally protected property interests, as well as the statute and federal regulations promulgated thereunder. The individual plaintiffs, joined by the CETA Workers’ Action Committee, commenced this action against the City and certain of its…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Hagans v. LavineSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Consortium of Community Based Organizations v. DonovanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1982
  2. Balf Co., Inc. v. GaitorDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1982
  3. Uniformed Firefighters Ass'n, Local 94 v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  4. CONSORTIUM OF COM. BASED ORGANIZATIONS v. DonovanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API