Legal Opinion
Balf Co., Inc. v. Gaitor
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided March 17, 1982No. Civ. H-80-451PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
CLARIE, Chief Judge.
The defendants have moved to dismiss this action, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b), arguing that the plaintiff lacks standing to challenge their decision to restrict vehicular traffic on Stone and Brookfield Streets in the City of Hartford. The plaintiff Balf Company claims that the defendants, who include several state and municipal officials, violated the Federal Aid-Highways Act, 23 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. (“FAHA”), when implementing this traffic control policy and under the principles enunciated by the Supreme Court in Maine v.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Maine v. ThiboutotSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Chapman v. Houston Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- New York Airlines, Inc. v. Dukes CountyDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1985
- Allandale Neighborhood Association v. Austin Transportation Study Policy Advisory CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Arden House, Inc. v. HeintzDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1985
- Levine v. Town of West Hartford Police DepartmentDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1982
- Allandale Neighborhood Association v. Austin Transportation Study Policy Advisory CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.