Queen Anne Park Homeowners Ass'n v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentFairhurst, J.
¶12 (dissenting) — This case presents the question of “[w]hat does ‘collapse’ mean under Washington law in an insurance policy that insures ‘accidental direct physical loss involving collapse,’ . . . but does not define ‘collapse.’ ” Queen Anne Park Homeowners Ass’n v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 763 F.3d 1232, 1235 (9th Cir. 2014). By defining “collapse” as “ ‘substantial impairment of structural integrity,’ ” the majority expands the meaning of “collapse” from its commonsense and traditional definition. Majority at 487. Because “substantial impairment of structural integrity” is too far…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Boeing Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Overton v. Consolidated Ins. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
- Overton v. Consolidated InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Beach v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Central Mutual Insurance Co. v. RoyalSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.