Legal Opinion

Ondrak v. Matis

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 2005No. S-04-764PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

The appellant, Steven M. Ondrak, sought specific performance on a contract for the sale of property. After Ondrak filed a notice of lis pendens — but before service was perfected — the appellee, Lizabeth L. Matis, sold the property to a third party, Jim and Doris Wilson. Ondrak did not join the Wilsons as parties to the suit. The district court determined that the property at issue was personal property and that the lis pendens did not apply to allow for specific performance. The court granted Matis’ motion for summary judgment. We determine that the lis pendens would allow for specific…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Garrison General Tire Service, Inc. v. MontgomeryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Bradley T. Ex Rel. D.T. v. Central Catholic High SchoolNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Olson v. Le Mars Mutual Insurance Company of IowaNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Hutson v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Hubbard v. Hardeman County BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1993

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Worth v. KolbeckNebraska Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Anis v. BryanLGH HEALTH SYSTEMNebraska Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Ondrak v. MatisNebraska Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API