Legal Opinion

Oakland County Prosecutor v. Forty-Sixth District Judge

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 1976No. Docket 25774PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, P. J.

Linda Zuppke (hereinafter defendant) was charged with delivery of a controlled substance, MCLA 335.341(l)(b); MSA 18.1070(41)(l)(b). At the conclusion of the preliminary examination, the district judge granted defendant’s motion to dismiss on the basis of entrapment. The people petitioned the circuit court for a writ of superintending control requiring that defendant be bound over for trial. The circuit court granted the writ and defendant appeals of right.

Before reaching the merits, a procedural question must be resolved. Was superintending control the appropriate method for reviewing the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. TurnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Cahill v. Fifteenth District JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Moore v. Ninth District JudgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Morcom v. Recorder's Court JudgesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. People v. PolkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. JamiesonMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Oakland County Prosecutor v. 46th District JudgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  3. People v. GeorgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. McCoyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Bay County Prosecutor v. Bay County District JudgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API