Legal Opinion

People v. George

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 17, 1982No. Docket 52491PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.

When a trial judge has found no probable cause to hold a defendant for trial and the prosecutor has appealed that decision, may the prosecutor seek to dismiss the appeal and bring new charges against the defendant when he has discovered no new evidence? We believe that, on the facts of this case, this procedure violates a defendant’s right to due process of law.

On January 25, 1979, defendants George Henry George, John W. Paluzzi and Demetrios Hatsios were charged with one count of conspiring to obtain money under false pretenses, and with three counts of obtaining money under false pretenses,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Solesbee v. BalkcomSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. People v. UhlemannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People v. DossMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. HetheringtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. VargoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Kyle Joseph Anderson v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. WallsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. People v. DunbarMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  5. United States v. Anthony D. KendrickCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API