Legal Opinion

Peek v. Southern Guaranty Insurance

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 3, 1978No. 32720, 32737PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, Justice.

Certiorari was granted to decide whether the grants of summary judgment in favor of the insurance company were properly affirmed by the Court of Appeals as reported at 142 Ga. App. 671 (236 SE2d 767) (1977), and 142 Ga. App. 678 (237 SE2d 19) (1977). A tort action was brought by the widow of a man killed in a motorcycle accident and by their son who was a passenger and was injured. The plaintiffs’ action was against the drivers and the owners of two cars involved.

The insurance company which insured one of the car owners brought declaratory judgment against all parties to the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. PerryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  2. Flanders v. Hill Aircraft & Leasing Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. LaSalle National Insurance v. PophamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
  4. Reserve Life Insurance v. BeardenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  5. RESERVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF DALLAS, TEXAS v. BeardenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Exxon Corp. v. ThomasonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  2. Sentry Indemnity Co. v. SharifSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  3. Pearce v. Southern Guaranty InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Whitby v. MaloyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  5. Powell v. Time InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API