Legal Opinion

Exxon Corp. v. Thomason

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided September 21, 1998No. S97G1723PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fletcher, Presiding Justice.

We granted certiorari in this case to consider the requirement that a defendant set up a meritorious defense in order to open default. Because the court of appeals construed this requirement too narrowly, we reverse the court of appeals’judgment, 1 which held that the trial court erred in opening Exxon Corporation’s default.

James Thomason filed suit against Exxon and others alleging that leaking storage tanks on Exxon’s adjacent property contaminated his property with petroleum. Exxon did not file a timely answer. After the fifteen days in which a defendant may…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Beauchamp v. KnightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Axelroad v. PrestonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1974
  3. Blanch v. KingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Peek v. Southern Guaranty InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  5. Ambassador College v. GoetzkeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Johnson v. American National Red CrossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  2. BOWEN v. SAVOYSupreme Court of Georgia · 2020
  3. Butterworth v. Safelite Glass Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  4. Tomsic v. Marriott International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  5. Sprewell v. Thompson & Hutson, South Carolina, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API