Legal Opinion

Flanders v. Hill Aircraft & Leasing Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 16, 1976No. 51382PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Judge.

This appeal is taken from the denial of Flanders’ (plaintiff below) motion fora new trial. Flanders brought action against defendant Hill Aircraft & Leasing Corporation for breach of warranty as to airworthiness, merchantability and fitness of a twin engine aircraft sold by Hill Aircraft to Flanders. Flanders sought damages caused by expenses incurred in repairs and maintenance of the aircraft, installment payments made pursuant to contract, attorney fees, and punitive damages for fraudulent and deceitful representations. Hill Aircraft failed to file a timely answer. The trial…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lenney v. FinleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. EarleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Bendle v. Ortho Mattress, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Gary v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  5. Cooper v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Cohran v. CarlinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1985
  2. Peek v. Southern Guaranty InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  3. Whitby v. MaloyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Magnan v. Miami Aircraft Support, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  5. First Union National Bank v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API