Legal Opinion

Doyon Universal Services v. Allen

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 2000No. S-8956PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARPENETI, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Doyon Universal Services and Alaska National Insurance Company (collectively, “Doyon”) appeal the determination of the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board that Lawrence Allen’s small bowel obstruction was work-connected and that the Brussels sprouts he ingested at Doyon’s facility were a “substantial factor” in causing his disability. Because substantial evidence supports the Board’s determination, we affirm.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

A. Facts

Lawrence Allen was employed as a cook by Doyon at a remote site on the Trans-Alaska Pipeline. While he was on…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. AbbottAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Fruit v. SchreinerAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Thornton v. Alaska Workmen's Compensation BoardAlaska Supreme Court · 1966

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Shea v. State, Department of Administration, Division of Retirement & BenefitsAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Cowen v. Wal-MartAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Nickels v. NapolilliAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Thurston v. Guys With Tools, Ltd.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Copeland v. State, Commercial Fisheries Entry CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API