Legal Opinion

United States v. Rappolt & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 26, 1918No. 1899PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 41813. [Oral argument Nov. 8, 1918, by Mr. Hanson and Mr. Hillis.]

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

The importation in this case consists of embroidered cotton handkerchiefs manufactured in St. Gall, Switzerland, each handkerchief being separately packed in an individual pasteboard box or carton. When prepared for exportation, a certain number of these boxes were placed in a large pasteboard box, and a number of the latter in turn were packed in outside wooden cases. The goods were subject to an ad valorem duty under the tariff act of 1913.

When the importers came to state the value of the importation at entry they inadvertently failed to include therein at any place or in any manner the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. DowningCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Ocean Brokerage Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  2. United States v. Glendinning, McLeish & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  3. Frank P. Dow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Borgfeldt & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  5. H. P. Lambert Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API